LGBT Travelers worst destinations

We’ve covered some of the best places for the gay traveler to go, but what about the worst? What are the places that you should stay away from at all costs?

Here’s our list of some of the worst gay travel destinations in the world.

6. Poland

Ok, so Poland rarely tops vacation destination lists. It does, however, sport such attractions as sculpted salt mines, Warsaw’s historic ghetto and old town, and prime skiing mountains.

Despite the decent number of things to see and do, as well as the fact that it’s very cheap, it’s hardly the best place for an LGBT person to go out and do their thing. Not that there aren’t gay bars, Warsaw and Krakow sport some fine nightspots, but the official atmosphere there is very anti-gay at the moment. Run by a ultra-conservative Catholic regime, Poland has swung far to the right in recent years.

From the anti-gay legislation passed last year to the banning of several prides to the government’s farcical attack on gay teletubbies, Poland’s government, if not all of its people, is doing its best to make sure that gays are not welcome in the country.

5. Jamaica

A great place to be beaten by anti-gay lynch mobs!Jamaica is home to white sandy beaches, reggae and dancehall music, gorgeous natural beauty and murderous anti-gay thugs. Sounds fantastic! Wait, what was that last one again? The Caribbean is hardly the home of LGBT rights, but Jamaica is in a class of its own. Time magazine and several gay rights groups named Jamaica “The Most Homophobic Place in the World” in 2006. It doesn’t help that those reggae and dancehall stars the country is so famous for seem to have a thing for calling upon their listeners to murder gay people, which many of them seem all too willing to do.

Two of the biggest gay and AIDS activists in Jamaica, Brian Williamson and Steve Harvey, were murdered in the past few years. A crowd danced and celebrated around Williamson’s mutilated body afterwards. In 2004, a teenager whose father found he was gay invited a lynch mob to the boy’s school and nearly killed him. Mob violence against gays in the country is at epidemic levels, and it’s hardly limited to Jamaicans themselves.

In 2006 two American television producers working in the island were beaten into a coma by an anti-gay mob. If you absolutely must visit the Caribbean try Curacao or the US Virgin Islands, all of which target gay travelers. Give Jamaica a miss.

4. Egypt

Who wouldn’t want to go to Egypt? It’s got the relics of the most advanced civilization in ancient times, the Pyramids, the Nile and of course Cairo. Plus you can really get that authentic Egyptian experience by getting arrested and thrown in jail for being a homosexual. Bonus points and extra jail time if you’re HIV+! Unless jail, after a beating from the notoriously violent local police force of course, sounds like fun for the whole family for you then it’d be best to keep as far away as possible from Egypt as you can. The US State department has issued several official warnings about gay tourists traveling to the country –as they have about all the countries on this list incidentally- and Egypt has been busy recently tossing HIV+ citizens in jail with only the merest hint of a trial for the past few months. It’s ok though, several years in jail oughta teach them not to get AIDS or be gay. As every prison movie tells us, jail is the best place to go to avoid any type of homosexuality. That and the Navy. All kidding aside, do not go around announcing your sexuality in Egypt. Yes, there are gay bars in Cairo. That does not mean homosexuality is tolerated. Be very careful.

3. Uganda/Nigeria/Gambia

Gambian President Yahya Jammeh wants you dead if you are reading this.

Uganda, Nigeria and Gambia are our joint sub-Saharan African winners. They’ve all got that special anti-gay quality about them, but it’s just too hard to pick just one to stay away from at the moment. On the one hand, you have Gambia’s president announcing his intentions to kill all gay people, followed by the arrest of several gay tourists shortly afterwards. On the other hand, you have Nigeria and Uganda’s official churches promoting lynch mobs against homosexuals in the country and banning gay marriage. It’s a tough decision I know, but I think you can make the right one and just stay out of all of these countries for the moment.

2. United Arab Emirates

The UAE will here stand in as a representative for the Arab countries that you should never ever visit ever. They probably won’t kill you if you're a foreigner-from an allied country at least-that’s the good news. However, much like good buddy Saudi Arabia, homosexuality is illegal in the UAE and they are really touchy about it. In 2005 the US State Department named the UAE in its anti-gay document for arresting 26 people, then subjecting them to hormone treatments in an attempt to change their sexuality and make them straight. I can only imagine what they might try on a transgender traveler. If you must visit the Middle East try Israel, where their anti-gay feeling is generally confined to protests and shouting, rather than whips, beatings, and the occasional beheading.

1. Iran

These two teens were hung for being homosexual in Iran.Unlike the UAE, I cannot suggest that Iran will not kill you if you are arrested for practicing homosexuality within its borders. It’s certainly not shy about executing its own citizens for being gay, and these days it shows less and less concern about the outside world’s opinions. It’s a dangerous combination, and hardly makes for an ideal holiday. It’s too bad too, as Iran has some fantastic history and architecture that really would make for a fantastic journey.

Merry Christmas form OUTWEEKLY

OUTWEEKLY wishes you and your family a Merry Merry Christmas and a prosperous New Year, we thank you for choosing OUTWEEKLY as your number one (1) site for LGBT New and Entertainment in Jamaica.

We look forward in serving you in the years 2009.

OUTWEEKLY

"Together we stand divided we fall;"

Also log on to see the Chairman Message for the year 2009.

Pope Benedict- "Homosexuality is a threat to humanity."

The head of the Roman Catholic Church has claimed that the existence of gay people is as great a threat to humanity as the destruction of the rainforest.
Pope Benedict XVI also attacked transgender people and claimed that a "blurring" of genders would lead to the extinction of the human race.
The pontiff made his remarks in an "end of year" address to the Vatican's central administration, the Curia.

The Pope said behaviour beyond traditional heterosexual relations is "a destruction of God's work."
Benedict also said man must be protected "from the destruction of himself" and urged respect for the "nature of the human being as man and woman."
"The tropical forests do deserve our protection. But man, as a creature, does not deserve any less."

The Lesbian and Gay Christian Movement was outraged at this latest Papal outburst.
"It is comments like this that justify homophobic bullying that goes on in schools and it is comments like this that justify gay bashing," said LGCM chief executive Rev Sharon Ferguson.
"There are still so many instances of people being killed around the world, including in western society, purely and simply because of their sexual orientation or their gender identity.
"When you have religious leaders like that making that sort of statement then followers feel they are justified in behaving in an aggressive and violent way because they feel that they are doing God's work in ridding the world of these people."
The UK based gay humanist charity the Pink Triangle Trust has described the Pope's statement as clear evidence of paranoia.

"This must be the most ourtrageous and bizarre claim yet made by the Pope who has already got a well-deserved reputation as one the most viciously homophobic world leaders on a par with Mahmoud Ahmadinejad of Iran and Robert Mugabe of Zimbabwe," said PTT secretary and trustee George Broadhead.

"The Vatican has already reinforced its anti-gay reputation by strongly opposing a UN declaration calling for an end to discrimination against gays, but this latest Papal outburst is clear evidence of an obsession about homosexuality which is tantamount to paranoia."
Last week the Vatican opposed a statement at the United Nations reiterating the universal human rights of gay, lesbian, bisexual or trans people.

According to Roman Catholics, gay people are disordered and called to a life of celibacy.

66 and counting

Yesterday a statement was read at the United Nations General Assembly in New York reiterating the universal human rights of lesbian, gay, bisexual and trans people.
66 nations signed the joint statement, among them all 27 EU member states.
South Africa and the United States of America did not support the initiative.
The statement, which was a French initiative, was read out by Argentina's Ambassador the UN.
It does not create new rights and is not legally binding but instead builds on similar past initiatives.
It affirms the principle of universality: that all human beings, irrespective of their sexual orientation or gender identity, are entitled to equal dignity and respect.
No-one should be subject to violence, harassment, discrimination or abuse, solely because of their sexual orientation or gender identity.
Louis Georges Tin, the founder of the Inernational Day Against Homophobia (IDAHO), is behind the universal decriminalisation declaration.
He met with Rama Yade, France's minister of human rights and foreign affairs, earlier this year.
In September she confirmed that she would appeal at the United Nations for the universal decriminalisation of homosexuality. The statement quickly became an international effort.
A cross-regional group of states coordinated the drafting, including Brazil, Croatia, France, Gabon, Japan, the Netherlands, and Norway.
The statement condemned killings, torture, arbitrary arrest, and "deprivation of economic, social and cultural rights, including the right to health."
The participating countries urged all nations to "promote and protect human rights of all persons, regardless of sexual orientation and gender identity," and to end all criminal penalties against people because of their sexual orientation or gender identity.
According to calculations by ILGA (the International Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender and Intersex Association) and other organisations, more than six dozen countries still have laws against consensual sex between adults of the same sex.
The UN Human Rights Committee, which interprets the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR), a core UN treaty, held in a historic 1994 decision that such laws are rights violations – and that human rights law forbids discrimination based on sexual orientation.
In 2006 IDAHO initiated a global campaign to end the criminalisation of same-sex relationships and secured the support of dozens of international public figures, ranging from Nobel Prize winners to writers, clergy,actors, musicans and academics.
"To decriminalise homosexuality worldwide is a battle for human rights," Mr Tin said.
"IDAHO has worked hard for two years to promote this issue. For us, the UN statement is a great achievement.
"I want to thank the many other people and organisations who have worked with us since the beginning, and more recently. I also want to remind everyone that ending the criminalisation of same-sex love will be a long, hard battle. To love is not a crime."
The 66 countries that signed the joint UN statement for LGBT human rights are:
Albania, Andorra, Argentina, Armenia, Australia, Austria
Belgium, Bolivia, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Brazil, Bulgaria
Canada, Cape Verde, Central African Republic, Chile, Colombia, Croatia, Cuba, Cyprus, Czech Republic
Denmark, Ecuador, Estonia, Finland, France, Gabon, Georgia, Germany, Greece, Guinea-Bissau
Hungary, Iceland, Ireland, Israel, Italy, Japan, Latvia, Liechtenstein, Lithuania, Luxembourg
Malta, Mauritius, Mexico, Montenegro, Nepal, Netherlands, New Zealand, Nicaragua, Norway
Paraguay, Poland, Portugal, Romania
San Marino, Sao Tome and Principe, Serbia, Slovakia, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland
The former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, Timor-Leste, the United Kingdom, Uruguay, and Venezuela.
UK-based gay rights activist Peter Tatchell said:
"This was history in the making. Totally ground-breaking. It is the first time that the UN General Assembly has been presented with a statement in support of lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender (LGBT)human rights.
"Securing this statement at the UN is the result of an inspiring collective global effort by many LGBT and human rights organisations. Our collaboration, unity and solidarity have won us this success."
"As well as IDAHO, I pay tribute to the contribution and lobbying of Amnesty International; ARC International; Center for Women's Global Leadership; COC Netherlands; Global Rights; Human Rights Watch;International Committee for IDAHO (the International Day Against Homophobia); International Gay and Lesbian Human Rights Commission (IGLHRC); International Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender andIntersex Association (ILGA); International Service for Human Rights; Pan Africa ILGA; and Public Services International.
"The UN statement goes much further than seeking the decriminalisation of same-sex acts.
"It condemns all human rights violations based on sexual orientation and gender identity, urges countries to protect the human rights of LGBT people and to bring to justice those who violate these rights, and calls for human rights defenders who oppose homophobic and transphobic victimisation to be allowed to carry outtheir advocacy and humanitarian work unimpeded."
The New York Times reports that "nearly 60 nations" backed a counter statement read by Syria that claimed the gay rights "threatened to undermine the international framework of human rights by trying to normalise pedophilia, among other acts."
LGBT rights group ARC-International said:
"The signatories overcame intense opposition from a group of governments that regularly try to block UN attention to violations based on sexual orientation and gender identity.
"Only 57 states signed an alternative text promoted by the Organisation of the Islamic Conference.
"While affirming the "principles of non-discrimination and equality," they claimed that universal human rights did not include "the attempt to focus on the rights of certain persons."
Australia and US not signed up to UN decriminalisation declaration
Burundi MPs vote to criminalise same-sex acts ahead of UN appeal
France to ask UN for universal decriminalisation of homosexuality
UK is "committed to promoting LGBT rights overseas"

UN envoy calls on Caribbean nations to decriminalise homosexual acts

The United Nations special envoy for HIV/AIDS in the Caribbean has said that countries in the region should move to decriminalise gay sex.
George Alleyne said that such a move would help the fight against AIDS.
"I believe that the existence of these laws contribute to infected and potentially infected men not coming forward to be tested, and I will propose that such laws be revised," he said at a meeting in Guyana.
In 2007, an estimated 230,000 people in the Caribbean were living with HIV, while an estimated 20,000 were newly infected, and 14,000 died of AIDS-related illnesses, according to UNAIDS.
Mr Alleyne said homophobia was rampant and one of several "egregious manifestations of stigma and discrimination," reports the Latin American Herald Tribune.
His comments echo those of a British government minister.
Gareth Thomas, minister of state at the Department for International Development, told PinkNews.co.uk last month that tackling state and cultural homophobia is vital to the fight against HIV in the Caribbean.
He said he was concerned that "things are not getting better on either front, and more change is necessary."
His role at DFID has responsibility for HIV and Mr Thomas has visited the Caribbean several times.
"During those visits I have been struck by the extent to which homophobia and the anti-gay legislation is impacting the effort to fight the surge of HIV infections," he said.
During a recent meeting with Jamaica's Prime Minister, Foreign Minister and Trade Minister, Mr Thomas raised the issue head on.
"We had an acknowledgment there was an issue, though there was not a conversation about immediate next steps," he said.

UN General Assembly statement

UN statement on decriminalising homosexuality and supporting LGBT human rights There are a number of new developments: The UN "declaration" is being called a "statement" and technically (in UN terms) is it a statement not a declaration, so it is best to call it a statement in any publicity or media coverage.

The statement is finalised, so the US and other countries cannot claim that it is not finalised and use this as an excuse to explain their non-signature (a copy of the UN statement follows below). Please note that the recommendations of the UN statement include more than the decriminalisation of homosexuality: As well as seeking the decriminalisation of same-sex acts, the statement also condemns all human rights violations based on sexual orientation and gender identity, urges countries to protect the human rights of LGBT people and to bring to justice those who violate these rights, and calls for human rights defenders who oppose homophobia and transphobia to be allowed to carry out their humanitarian work unimpeded. A list of supporting countries (as of now) is below.

Contrary to earlier reports, Australia and Venezuela have signed. Guinea-Bissau was thought to have agreed but has, in fact, not yet signed up. It probably will sign but this is not 100% certain. France may not now present and read the statement to the UN General Assembly. It might instead hand this task to a developing country (so the statement does not seem a purely western initiative).

CONFIRMED SIGNATORIES SO FAR - MORE PENDING According to Human Rights Watch, these countries have signed so far:

Andorra, Argentina, Armenia, Australia, Austria, Belgium, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Brazil, Bulgaria, Canada, Cape Verde, Central African Republic, Chile, Croatia, Cyprus, Czech Republic, Denmark, Ecuador, Estonia, Finland, France, Gabon, Georgia, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Iceland, Ireland, Israel, Italy, Japan, Latvia, Liechtenstein, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Malta, Mexico, Montenegro, Netherlands, New Zealand, Norway, Poland, Portugal, Romania, San Marino, Serbia, Slovakia, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, The Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, United Kingdom, Uruguay, Venezuela.

FULL TEXT OF THE UN STATEMENT

We have the honour to make this statement on human rights, sexual orientation and gender identity on behalf of [.] 1 - We reaffirm the principle of universality of human rights, as enshrined in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights whose 60th anniversary is celebrated this year, Article 1 of which proclaims that "all human beings are born free and equal in dignity and rights"; 2 - We reaffirm that everyone is entitled to the enjoyment of human rights without distinction of any kind, such as race, colour, sex, language, religion, political or other opinion, national or social origin, property, birth or other status, as set out in Article 2 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and Article 2 of the International Covenants on Civil and Political, Economic, Social and Cultural Rights, as well as in article 26 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights; 3 - We reaffirm the principle of non-discrimination which requires that human rights apply equally to every human being regardless of sexual orientation or gender identity; 4 - We are deeply concerned by violations of human rights and fundamental freedoms based on sexual orientation or gender identity; 5 - We are also disturbed that violence, harassment, discrimination, exclusion, stigmatisation and prejudice are directed against persons in all countries in the world because of sexual orientation or gender identity, and that these practices undermine the integrity and dignity of those subjected to these abuses; 6 - We condemn the human rights violations based on sexual orientation or gender identity wherever they occur, in particular the use of the death penalty on this ground, extrajudicial, summary or arbitrary executions, the practice of torture and other cruel, inhuman and degrading treatment or punishment, arbitrary arrest or detention and deprivation of economic, social and cultural rights, including the right to health; 7 - We recall the statement in 2006 before the Human Rights Council by fifty four countries requesting the President of the Council to provide an opportunity, at an appropriate future session of the Council, for discussing these violations; 8 - We commend the attention paid to these issues by special procedures of the Human Rights Council and treaty bodies and encourage them to continue to integrate consideration of human rights violations based on sexual orientation or gender identity within their relevant mandates; 9 - We welcome the adoption of Resolution AG/RES. 2435 (XXXVIII-O/08) on "Human Rights, Sexual Orientation, and Gender Identity" by the General Assembly of the Organization of American States during its 38th session in 3 June 2008; 10 - We call upon all States and relevant international human rights mechanisms to commit to promote and protect human rights of all persons, regardless of sexual orientation and gender identity; 11 - We urge States to take all the necessary measures, in particular legislative or administrative, to ensure that sexual orientation or gender identity may under no circumstances be the basis for criminal penalties, in particular executions, arrests or detention. 12 - We urge States to ensure that human rights violations based on sexual orientation or gender identity are investigated and perpetrators held accountable and brought to justice; 13 - We urge States to ensure adequate protection of human rights defenders, and remove obstacles which prevent them from carrying out their work on issues of human rights and sexual orientation and gender identity. ACTION ALERT The presentation of the statement for the worldwide decriminalisation of homosexuality and for the human rights of LGBT people is now expected to take place at the UN General Assembly between 15 and 20 December. This means there is still time to lobby governments to sign up and support it.

Ten years for JFLAG

Kingston, Jamaica
December 10, 2008 marks ten years since the founding of the Jamaica Forum forLesbians, All-sexuals and Gays (J-FLAG), Jamaica’s foremost lesbian, gay andtransgender rights advocacy group. The anniversary will be commemorated with achurch service on the weekend. As J-FLAG celebrates this milestone, it pauses to reflecton the challenges and successes that have shaped its journey thus far.
Started by a group of 12 business people, educators, lawyers, public relationspractitioners, advertisers and human rights activists, J-FLAG was launched in the weehours of December 10, 2008. The organisation was born out of the need to advocatefor the protection of lesbians, gays and transgenders from state-sanctioned andcommunity violence. In this regard, J-FLAG’s call was for the fair and equal treatment ofgays and lesbians under the law and by the ordinary citizen.
The organisation’s birth was condemned and decried by most as a foolhardy venturethat would result in a backlash against members of the country’s lesbian, gay, bisexualand transgender community. On the other hand, it was welcomed by a few as a boldattempt to recognise lesbians, gays and transgenders as members of plural Jamaicansociety.
After ten years of existence, J-FLAG can boast of having survived in one of the mostinhospitable environments for gays, lesbians and transgender people. Indeed, much ofJ-FLAG’s work has revolved around the rescuing of community members from violentsituations or attempting to deal with the aftermath of such situations. In fact, theviolent death of Brian Williamson, one of the co-founders of J-FLAG—and for years itsvoice and face—and the recent departure of Gareth Henry, a former programmesmanager of the organisation, testify to the dangerous environment in which theorganisation operates.
Yet J-FLAG has been able to do what was, ten years ago, unthinkable in Jamaica. It hasvisited and made presentations on sexuality and human rights to a variety of local andinternational organisations, including religious, civic and human rights groups as well astertiary educational institutions and the police. It has also met with and given interviewswith radio and newspaper reporters. But perhaps its most significant achievements havebeen the submission to parliament regarding the addition of sexual orientation as acategory for which there should be constitutional protection against discrimination andthe assistance, in 2006, to relaunch the Caribbean Forum for Lesbians, All-sexuals andGays (C-FLAG).
Over the ten years of its existence, J-FLAG has stood as a singular voice in Jamaicacalling for the respect of lesbians, gays and transgenders as citizens with the samerights and value as heterosexual Jamaicans. For the next phase of its journey, theorganisation will continue calling Jamaicans to a deeper understanding of their pluralityand their democracy; it will continue seeking to raise the level of debate in the societyabout the meaning of tolerance and the acceptance of difference. Accordingly, J-FLAGwill attempt to forge new relationships with a wider cross-section of organisationscommitted to strengthening democracy and the promotion of respect for all Jamaicans,regardless of sexual orientation, gender, creed, religion or social status.-30-

The Inter-American Commission on Human Rights (IACHR) report on Jamaica's Human Rights

The Inter-American Commission on Human Rights (IACHR) has said that gay and lesbian people in Jamaica suffer disproportionately in the deteriorating situation in the Caribbean nation.
IACHR issued preliminary observations after its visit to observe the human rights situation in Jamaica, which took place at the invitation of the government last week.
It focused particular attention on the situation of citizen security in the country and the human rights of women, children, and persons suffering discrimination on the basis of their sexual orientation.
The Commission said it had "verified an extremely high level of violence in Jamaica," which has one of the highest murder rates in the world.
"The historical response of the State has been inadequate, due to the absence of an integral policy to address and prevent violence, the failure to dedicate sufficient resources to the problem, and the absence of an effective response by the police, judiciary and other authorities," it reported.
"This has led to a progressive deterioration of the human rights situation in the country.
"This critical situation disproportionately affects the poorest sectors of the population, as well as women, children and people who face discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation."
The situation for gay and lesbian people was highlighted by IACHR. Homosexual acts are illegal in Jamaica.
"The Commission strongly condemns the high level of homophobia that prevails throughout Jamaican society," it said.
"This homophobia has resulted in violent killings of persons thought to be gay, lesbian, bisexual or transsexual, as well as stabbings, mob attacks, arbitrary detention and police harassment.
"The resulting fear in turn makes it difficult for people within this group to access certain basic services, for example, medical services that might reveal their sexual orientation.
"Defenders of the rights of gays, lesbians, bisexuals and transsexuals have been murdered, beaten and threatened, and the police have been criticized for failing in many instances to prevent or respond to reports of such violence.
"The State must take measures to ensure that people within this group can associate freely, and exercise their other basic rights without fear of attack.
"During its visit, the Commission received reports on four murders in circumstances suggesting homophobia over a period of a year and a half.
"One such murder was reportedly a consequence of the firebombing of the house of a person thought to be homosexual, and another man perceived to be homosexual was chopped to death by machete.
"The IACHR reminds the government and the people of Jamaica that the right of all persons to be free from discrimination is guaranteed by international human rights law, specifically the American Convention on Human Rights.
"The IACHR urges Jamaica to take urgent action to prevent and respond to these human rights abuses, including through the adoption of public policy measures and campaigns against discrimination based on sexual orientation, as well as legislative reforms designed to bring its laws into conformity with the American Convention on Human Rights."
In June a poll commissioned by the Jamaica Gleaner found that 45% are more likely to vote for incumbent Prime Minister Bruce Golding and his Jamaica Labour Party after he told the BBC that he would never allow gays in his Cabinet.
26% of people who identified as supporters of the rival People's National Party said they were more likely to vote for Golding after his outburst.
Just five percent said they were less likely to vote for him after his widely-reported comments.
70% of Jamaicans do not believe that gay men and lesbians should be granted equal rights, the island-wide poll found.
The dancehall music scene on the island is notorious for its homophobia, with many artists taking pleasure in calling for gays and lesbians to be murdered.
A British minister raised the issue of decriminalisation of homosexual acts at a recent meeting with the Prime Minister of Jamaica.
Gareth Thomas, minister of state at the Department for International Development, told PinkNews.co.uk that tackling state and cultural homophobia is vital to the fight against HIV in the Caribbean.
He said he was concerned that "things are not getting better on either front, and more change is necessary."
His role at DFID has responsibility for HIV and Mr Thomas has visited the Caribbean several times.
"During those visits I have been struck by the extent to which homophobia and the anti-gay legislation is impacting the effort to fight the surge of HIV infections," he said.
During a recent meeting with Jamaica's Prime Minister, Foreign Minister and Trade Minister, Mr Thomas raised the issue head on.
"We had an acknowledgment there was an issue, though there was not a conversation about immediate next steps," he said.
Mr Thomas also met with members of Jamaica's gay community and said he was shocked by their experiences.
"Some of their stories are horrific," he told PinkNews.co.uk.
"People who have been forced out of churches, out of their jobs and on occasion, violence.
"By any stretch of the imagination it is a disgrace and we need the state to take action."
Mr Thomas said the UK asylum system would look at gay and lesbian asylum seekers on a case by case basis.
The IACHR is an autonomous organ of the Organisation of American States (OAS).
Its mandate is found in the OAS Charter and the American Convention on Human Rights. The IACHR represents all of the member States of the OAS.
It also reported on the treatment of Jamaicans living with HIV after its recent visit.
"The Commission received information about the situation of discrimination against HIV-infected persons in Jamaican society," it said.
"Approximately 27,000 persons in Jamaica are reported to be infected with HIV, 73% of these are between the ages of 20 and 49.
"The Commission was informed that once an HIV-infected person’s family and community are made aware of his/her status, they are often rejected from their homes and communities.
"Further, HIV infected persons are reportedly denied equal access to healthcare due to discrimination based on their medical status.
"Public education and prevention outreach with the HIV infected population is difficult because this illness remains a social taboo in Jamaican society and largely associated with gays, lesbians, bisexuals and transsexuals, who also suffer severe discrimination.
"Given that Jamaica’s legislation criminalises sodomy, gay persons living with HIV are especially vulnerable to discrimination and violence."

United Nations Declaration calling for the global decriminalisation of homosexuality.

"The US government is one of the only western democratic nations that has declined to support a United Nations Declaration calling for the global decriminalisation of homosexuality. The Declaration will be put before the UN General Assembly this Wednesday, 10 December, which is Human Rights Day and the sixtieth anniversary of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights," reports British gay human rights campaigner Peter Tatchell of the London-based LGBT rights group, OutRage!

"It will be the first time in its history that the UN General Assembly has ever considered the issue of lesbian, gay, bisexual or transgender (LGBT) human rights," he said.
"Although not be binding on the member states, the declaration will have immense symbolic value, given the six decades in which homophobic persecution has been ignored by the UN.
For a summary of the countries supporting the Declaration, see below.
"Even today, not a single international human rights convention explicitly acknowledges the human rights of LGBT people. The right to physically love the person of one's choice is nowhere enshrined in any global humanitarian law. No convention recognises sexual rights as human rights. None offer explicit protection against discrimination based on sexual orientation or gender identity," added Mr Tatchell.

"Eighty-six countries (nearly half the nations on Earth) still have a total ban on male homosexuality and a smaller number also ban sex between women. The penalties in these countries range from a few years jail to life imprisonment. In at least seven countries or regions of countries (all under Islamist jurisdiction), the sentence is death: Saudi Arabia, Iran, Yemen, Sudan, Mauritania and parts of Nigeria and Pakistan:
See the global homophobia survey produced by the International Lesbian and Gay Association: http://www.ilga.org/news_results.asp?LanguageID=1&FileCategoryID=9&FileID=1165&ZoneID=7
"Unsurprisingly, the Vatican and the Organisation of Islamic States are leading the fight against the UN declaration."

Last week, the Papal envoy to the UN, Monsignor Celestino Migliore, explained the "logic" of the Holy See's opposition when he announced the Vatican's rejection of this week's decriminalisation declaration, as reported in The Times newspaper in London:
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/comment/faith/article5268745.ece
The Monsignor argued that the UN declaration would unfairly "pillory" countries where homosexuality is illegal; forcing them to establish "new categories (gay people) protected from discrimination." Such laws would "create new and implacable acts of discrimination.... States where same-sex unions are not recognized as 'marriages,' for example, would be subject to international pressure."
"In other words, protecting LGBT people against discrimination is an act of discrimination against those who discriminate. Since the Vatican is against discrimination, it opposes discrimination against countries that discriminate. This is the mediaeval mindset of the Pope and his placemen," said Mr Tatchell.
"Never mind, there are already plenty of countries committed to supporting the UN decriminalisation declaration.

"It will be tabled in the General Assembly on Wednesday by France with the backing of all 27 member states of the European Union; plus non-EU European nations such as Norway, Switzerland, Iceland, Ukraine, Andorra, Liechtenstein, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Croatia, Montenegro, Serbia, Ukraine, Armenia and Macedonia. Russia and Turkey are not signing.
"The call for the decriminalisation of same-sex relationships also has the support of the Latin American states of Argentina, Brazil, Chile, Ecuador, Mexico, Uruguay - but not, notably, Columbia, Peru, Guyana or Venezuela.
"Only three African nations - Gabon, Cape Verde and Guinea-Bissau - are endorsing the declaration so far. South Africa has not signed up. No Caribbean nation has offered its support - not even Cuba.
"Although New Zealand is committed to the declaration, Australia is not. Nor is the United States. But Canada is a sponsor.
"No country in the Middle East, apart from Israel, endorses the declaration, and in Asia only Japan has agreed to approve it. China and India are silent on where they stand.
"The initiative for the UN universal decriminalisation declaration came from the inspiring French black activist and gay rights campaigner, Louis-Georges Tin, the founder of the http://www.idahomophobia.org/ International Day Against Homophobia (IDAHO). He lobbied the French government, which agreed to take the lead in getting the declaration tabled at the UN. Member organisations of the global IDAHO network then petitioned their individual governments to support it.

"A reminder as to why this UN declaration matters occurred last Friday, a sad anniversary. On 5 December 2007, Makvan Mouloodzadeh, a 21-year-old Iranian man, was hanged in Kermanshah Central Prison, after an unfair trial. A member of Iran's persecuted Kurdish minority, he was executed on charges of raping other boys when he was 13. In other words, he committed these alleged acts when he was minor. According to Iranian law, a boy under 15 is a minor and cannot be executed. At Makvan's mockery of a trial, the alleged rape victims retracted their previous statements, saying they had made their allegations under duress. Makvan pleaded not guilty, telling the court that his confession was made under torture. He was hanged anyway, without a shred of credible evidence that he had even had sex with the boys, let alone raped them. The lies, defamation and homophobia of the debauched Iranian legal system was exposed when hundreds of villagers attended Makvan's funeral. People don't mourn rapists. This execution was bared-faced homophobic judicial murder, according to Arsham Parsi, Executive Director, of the underground Iranian Queer Railroad, which helps Iranian LGBTs fleeing arrest, torture and execution.

"Makvan's fate is just one example of the thousands of state-sponsored acts of homophobic persecution that happen worldwide ever year. It shows why Wednesday's UN declaration is so important - and so long overdue," said Mr Tatchell
Further information:

Peter Tatchell and OutRage!

+44 207 403 1790
peter@petertatchell.net
www.petertatchel.net
ENDS

The Tearoom Trade Study

Author: James M. DuBois

Description: In the 1960’s, Laud Humphreys observed men having sex with men in public restroomsof parks as part of his dissertation research without disclosing his role as a researcher.

Headings: Classic Historical CasesCase

Type: Decision making The Tearoom Trade Study From 1965 to 1968 Laud Humphreys, an ordained Episcopalian minister, conducted dissertation research on men who have impersonal sex with men (Humphreys, 1970). Without disclosing his role as a sociology researcher, Humphreys played the role of “watchqueen,” that is, he looked out for intruders while men performed oral sex on men in the public restrooms of parks in major metropolitan areas. Because he passed himself off as a voyeur – one who derives sexual gratification from observing the sex acts of others – he was permitted to watch acts that occurred in bathroom stalls without doors. Among other things, he gathered data on locations, the frequency of acts, the age of the men, the roles they played, and whether money changed hands.He later disclosed his role to some men he had observed and interviewed them on their daily lives. Inother cases, he recorded his subjects’ license plate numbers to track where they lived. A year later, after changing his hair and attire, he interviewed these same men in their homes under the guise ofconducting an anonymous public health survey. Humphreys reported that he recognized the need to protect the confidentiality of his data. He never published anecdotes that included identifiers, and he protected his notes carefully. However, he was observing illegal behaviors and if his notes were subpoenaed he might have been arrested and imprisoned for refusing to hand them over. While he always assumed he would refuse to hand overthe records, after later spending some time in jail (unrelated to the study), Humphreys questioned how long he might have withstood the pressure. Among the positive outcomes Humphreys cites was dispelling myths that the men he studied were dangerous social deviants: he found that most were married to women and had children; only 14% were exclusively homosexual and identified themselves as gay. Many within the gay community welcomed his research and in some police districts it lead to decreased raids and sodomy arrests. Others were upset because they believed that his research findings – published in a paperback book – basically presented the average man with a “how to” manual, i.e., with information on how to obtain cheap impersonal sex with men.

Youth Act up

With today's commemoration of World AIDS Day, Jamaican youth are being urged to take the lead in keeping HIV/AIDS issues on the public agenda and sex out of the schools.
Data from the Ministry of Health and Environment have revealed that AIDS is the second leading cause of death for youths between the ages of 15 and 24.
"Youth in school and out of school are called upon to champion the cause by example. Schools are no-sex zones and the National HIV/STI Programme (NHP) calls on youth to keep and promote schools as no-sex zones," Rudyard Spencer, minister of health and environment, said in his World AIDS Day message.
He added: "Youth need to become peer champions of change to get their sexually active peers to abstain from risky sexual practices, such as engaging in unprotected sex."
Between 1982 and 2007, 12,520 people have been reported with HIV/AIDS in Jamaica. However, the Health Ministry estimates that there are 27,000 Jamaicans living with HIV or AIDS and 18,000 are believed to be unaware of their status.
Spencer said about 73 per cent of all persons reported with HIV/AIDS in Jamaica are between 20 and 49 years old, adding that this age group represents the nation's vibrant, young and productive workforce.
The minister said another 2.5 per cent of those reported with HIV/AIDS are between 10 and 14 years old. Among persons reported with AIDS are 1.2 per cent of adolescents between 15 and 19 years.
Spencer said young people need to keep HIV out of their immune systems and discrimination out of their speech and demeanour.
"I charge all young people in Jamaica to join the promotion of abstinence and other safe sexual practices. I likewise call on parents and guardians to pay keen attention to the development of good morals and values in our young," he said.
Meanwhile, during a church service to commemorate World AIDS Day yesterday, Faith Hamer, policy advocacy officer in the Ministry of Health, urged members of the Swallowfield Chapel congregation to ensure that they get tested for HIV.
She noted that 90 per cent of persons infected with the disease, got infected while engaging in heterosexual practise. Hamer also said some 21 per cent of persons who are infected with the disease did not report high-risk behaviours

Gays March in Haiti on world AIDS day

A small group of men openly declared their homosexuality during a protest in Haiti at the weekend.
The event, which was held to mark World AIDS Day, has been described as the first gay Pride march in the Caribbean.
The island nation of nine million people is deeply conservative, but about a dozen men wore T-shirts declaring they are masisi, a local slang word for homosexual.
UN and government officials took part in the march in the city of St Marc calling for better treatments and prevention campaigns.
The number of people with HIV has risen in every region of the world in the past two years, with the fastest increases being seen in East Asia, Eastern Europe and Central Asia.
UNAIDS and the World Health Organisation said that in 2007 more than 33 million people live with HIV and AIDS worldwide and every day more than 6,800 people become infected with HIV, and 5,700 people die from AIDS.
Haiti has one of the highest infection rates in the world and gay men and lesbians face stigma and homophobic attitudes, though the voodoo community is accepting of homosexuality.
Michèle Pierre-Louis was able to take office in September as Prime Minister only after she had gone on the radio to deny rumours she is a lesbian.

Gay group backs Gay penguins

A pair of gay penguins has been stealing eggs from straight couples in an attempt to become 'fathers'.
The three-year-old male penguins who are kept in Polar Land in Harbin, north-east China attempted to conceal their theft by placing stones at the feet of the parents before waddling away with their eggs.

The deception however was noticed by the other penguins and the couple were soon ostracised from the group.
Keepers have decided to segregate the pair during hatching season to avoid disrupting the rest of the community.
Explaining the urge of the penguins to be fathers, a keeper from the zoo told the Austrian Times:
"One of the responsibilities of being a male adult is looking after the eggs. Despite this being a biological impossibility for this couple, the natural desire is still there.
"It's not discrimination. We have to fence them separately, otherwise the whole group will be disturbed during hatching time," he added.

Whilst examples of homosexuality in animals exist in many species, it is stories of penguins that have attracted the most attention.
In Germany, a zoo provoked anger from gay-rights groups when it attempted to mate a group of male penguins with Swedish female birds who were brought in especially to 'seduce' them.
The attempt failed however as the penguins refused to be 'turned', showing little interest in their would-be mates.
The children's book And Tango Makes Three, by Justin Richardson and Peter Parnell, published in 2005, tells the true story of penguins Roy and Silo, who formed a couple in New York's Central Park Zoo.
They attempted to hatch a rock, which was replaced by a rejected egg from a mixed gender couple by zoo keepers. They then adopted the baby penguin Tango as their own.
Several libraries stocking the book received complaints from people accusing the book of promoting homosexuality and being 'anti-family' as well as unsuitable for its age group.
It has attracted great controversy in US states with parents in Illinois and Missouri requesting the book be placed in a restricted or non-fiction section of the library.
"The complaints are that young children will believe that homosexuality is a lifestyle that is acceptable.

"The people complaining, of course, don't agree with that," said Judith Krug, director of the American Library Association’s Office for Intellectual Freedom.
The number of reported library complaints about And Tango Makes Three dropped from 546 in 2006 to 420 in 2007.

President-elect Barack Obama back gay rights

The next President of the United States has published a comprehensive list of action he will take on gay rights.

In a statement published on the Presidential transition website, Barack Obama and the Vice President-elect, Joe Biden, committed themselves to strengthening federal hate crimes protection by passing the Matthew Shepard Act.

The President-elect also committed to support civil unions and federal rights for LGBT couples.
"Barack Obama supports full civil unions that give same-sex couples legal rights and privileges equal to those of married couples," the statement read.
"Obama also believes we need to repeal the Defence of Marriage Act and enact legislation that would ensure that the 1,100+ federal legal rights and benefits currently provided on the basis of marital status are extended to same-sex couples in civil unions and other legally-recognised unions.

"These rights and benefits include the right to assist a loved one in times of emergency, the right to equal health insurance and other employment benefits, and property rights."
President-elect Obama supports the Employment Non-Discrimination Act, "and believes that our anti-discrimination employment laws should be expanded to include sexual orientation and gender identity.

"While an increasing number of employers have extended benefits to their employees' domestic partners, discrimination based on sexual orientation in the workplace occurs with no federal legal remedy," the statement read.

The President-elect said he would oppose a constitutional ban on same-sex marriage and the prohibition on openly gay, lesbian and bisexual people serving in the US Armed Forces.
"Barack Obama agrees with former Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff John Shalikashvili and other military experts that we need to repeal the "don't ask, don't tell" policy. The key test for military service should be patriotism, a sense of duty, and a willingness to serve.
"Discrimination should be prohibited. The U.S. government has spent millions of dollars replacing troops kicked out of the military because of their sexual orientation.
"Additionally, more than 300 language experts have been fired under this policy, including more than 50 who are fluent in Arabic.

"Obama will work with military leaders to repeal the current policy and ensure it helps accomplish our national defence goals."
President-elect Obama said he believes that we must ensure adoption rights for all couples and individuals, regardless of their sexual orientation.
"A child will benefit from a healthy and loving home, whether the parents are gay or not," the statement read.

The new administration will develop and begin to implement a comprehensive national HIV/AIDS strategy that includes all federal agencies within 12 months of taking office.
"The strategy will be designed to reduce HIV infections, increase access to care and reduce HIV-related health disparities," the statement read.
"Obama will support common sense approaches including age-appropriate sex education that includes information about contraception, combating infection within our prison population through education and contraception, and distributing contraceptives through our public health system.

"Obama also supports lifting the federal ban on needle exchange, which could dramatically reduce rates of infection among drug users.
"Obama has also been willing to confront the stigma — too often tied to homophobia — that continues to surround HIV/AIDS. He will continue to speak out on this issue as President."
The statement quotes a speech President-elect Obama gave in June 2007:
"While we have come a long way since the Stonewall riots in 1969, we still have a lot of work to do.

"Too often, the issue of LGBT rights is exploited by those seeking to divide us. But at its core, this issue is about who we are as Americans.
"It's about whether this nation is going to live up to its founding promise of equality by treating all its citizens with dignity and respect."
Barack Obama will take office on January 20th after a lavish Inauguration ceremony in Washington DC.

OUTWEEKLY CHATS WITH TATCHELL

Despite the effort to cancel Murder Music artist Bounty Killer from performing in the UK on Sunday November 23, 2008. OUTWEEKLY was able to talk with one of the master minder behind the Murder Music Campaign, Mr. Peter Tatchell of OUTRAGE!

In a letter send via-email, OUTWEEKLY congratulate Mr. Tatchell on his hard work over the years and his great contribution to human rights and the LGBT community, we encourage him to continue the good fight against Dancehall artist how preach hate crime in there music.

“We at OUTWEEKLY support the ban on Bounty Killer and all other Jamaican artist who incite violence in there music against gay and lesbian people worldwide. There constant promotions for queer bashing as cause an increase in gay attacks in the island of Jamaica and there must be an end to it.
They may denounce there homophobia in other countries when they want to get working permits to perform there, but here in Jamaica they do not, and they continue to release new songs preaching hate crime.”

We also went on to encourage him that despite the Police and Homeland Secretary giving permission for Bounty killer’s concert there are still other things local LGBT groups in the UK can do to cause a cancellation of his show.

OUTWEEKLY will continue to encourage members of the LGBT community in Jamaica and Companies not to support artist who have a homophobic agenda.

In a response Mr. Tatchell thank us for being a supporter of the Stop Murder Music Campaign, encouraging us that despite the efforts to stop Bounty Killer from performing in the UK on Sunday the battle against Murder Music continues.

“We failed to stop Bounty Killer's concert, but we generated masses of media coverage and TV and radio phone-in discussions. We won the battle for hearts and minds. The public in the UK - both black and white - is against this music.”

He also when on to say that there will be a zero-tolerance to those who promote homophobia.

Efforts to contact Bounty Killer manager was unsuccessful.

Stop Murder Music

Stop Murder Music is a campaign is jointly run by Outrage!, the Black Gay Men's Advisory Group, and Jamaican gay rights organization Jamaica Forum of Lesbians, All-Sexuals and Gays (J-Flag).
The term 'Murder Music' was coined by British gay rights activist Peter Tatchell in the mid-1990s to describe the homophobic work of certain Jamaican musicians, primarily dancehall and ragga artists who called for and encouraged physical violence and murder of homosexuals[citation needed].
The Stop Murder Music Campaign have accused Beenie Man, Elephant Man, Sizzla, Bounty Killer, Vybz Kartel, Capleton, T.O.K., Buju Banton and others of promoting anti-gay violence, harassment, and bigotry through their music.
Tatchell has called for laws against homophobic music and the Campaign participated in protests outside concerts. The Campaign has especially objected to lyrics which seem to support violence, including murder, towards gay men. Tatchell's campaign began in the early 1990s when Buju Banton's song "Boom Bye-Bye" was released and has continued to date. Dennis Carney, chair of the Black Gay Men's Advisory Group, argued that the MOBO Awards had a responsibility to exclude anti-gay artists because, "homophobic lyrics in music normalise hatred towards black gay men." Tatchell picketed the MOBO Awards ceremony to protest at their inviting performers of murder music. Tatchell received death threats and was labelled a racist. Tatchell defended himself by pointing to a life's work campaigning against racism, and stated that his statements on Jamaica were in support of terrorised black groups within Jamaica.
Tatchell has also criticised other musicians, including Eminem.

Canada
Stop Murder Music (Canada) is an independent branch of the organization in Canada. It was founded by Akim Larcher, after learning at a local West-Indian store about a Canadian Tour by Elephant Man. Larcher, a lawyer, brought together 20 organizations who service the African and Caribbean communities in Canada to form the group. Murder Music is criminal in Canada because it is hate speech. The group has been successful in getting companies like iTunes Canada to stop selling criminal material.

Reggae Compassionate Act
The Reggae Compassionate Act was an agreement signed in 2007 by artists including Beenie Man, Capleton, and Sizzla, supporting the Stop Murder Music campaign.
The Reggae Compassionate Act has now been somewhat discredited as some artists have felt it was badly worded, whilst others (such as Beenie) have denied signing it. Others (including Elephant Man, TOK, Bounty Killa, and Vybz Kartel) have point blank refused to sign it.

Hypocrisy on homophobia

The Metropolitan Police is colluding with 'murder music' singers who incite the killing of lesbian and gay people

The Metropolitan Police is hypocritical on hate crimes. It allows homophobic singers to perform in London, but not racist ones. Racist artists are banned on the grounds that they are a threat to public order and good community relations. This is a case of double standards.
Why are homophobic artists given the green light to perform, even when they are on record inciting the murder of lesbian and gay people?
Inciting murder is a serious criminal offence. A Muslim cleric, Abdullah el-Faisal, was jailed for seven years in 2003 for inciting the murder of Hindus, Americans and Jews. Yet the police today give their approval for anti-gay "murder music" singers to hold concerts in London.
The latest example of this collusion is police endorsement of a concert by Jamaican "murder music" singer Bounty Killer. He is scheduled to perform at the Stratford Rex venue in East London next Sunday.
New Scotland Yard has given the go-ahead for this concert, despite Bounty Killer's encouragement of the killing of lesbian and gay people and despite Bounty Killer's refusal to sign the Reggae Compassionate Act (RCA), whereby singers promise to not incite homophobic violence.
The Met has previously said that "murder music" singers will not be allowed to perform unless they sign the RCA.
Officers have broken their promise. They are taking the side of a singer who has promoted and celebrated the murder of gay people, and who is defying the RCA.
The police do, however, stress that Bounty Killer will not be permitted to perform songs that incite homophobic violence. Big deal.
A white racist singer who advocated killing black people would not be allowed to perform in London, even if he agreed to not incite the killing of black people at his concert. The police would argue that any stage performance by a white racist singer would risk public disorder and damage community cohesion. They would ban him, full stop. They have adopted this zero tolerance policy towards white racist bands like Skrewdriver.
Yet when it comes to straight homophobic singers who urge the murder of gay people, the police take a softer stance. They have agreed to let the concert go ahead, despite their professed commitment to oppose homophobic hate crimes. It's bare-faced hypocrisy.
In March this year, police in Bradford and Birmingham stopped Bounty Killer's concerts, saying that they would have undermined good community relations. That same month the Met Police authorised his London concert to proceed. If other police forces can take a stand against homophobia, why can't the Metropolitan Police?
Why don't the government and police stop Bounty Killer from entering the UK? He has committed the criminal offence of incitement to murder. If a white singer advocated the killing of black people he would not be allowed into the country. The police commissioner would demand his exclusion. The home secretary would deny him a visa. Why the double standards?
The police apparently take the view that racism is worse than homophobia and that different standards should apply. This is completely outrageous.
Government and police hypocrisy is particularly glaring when we consider the exclusion from Britain of the American Black Muslim, Louis Farrakhan, leader of the Nation of Islam. I don't agree with Mr Farrakhan's politics or religion, but he has not urged his followers to kill anyone. So, why is he banned from Britain, while singers who incite the murder of gay people are not banned?
The apathetic gay community seems prepared to let the Met walk all over us. Black people would riot if the Met was colluding with racist performers. Most gay people instead hold up the white flag of surrender. They think we don't deserve the same protection as our black brothers and sisters.
Much of our queer community is riddled with internalised homophobia, including gay rights organisations – many of which apparently agree with the police that inciting racist violence is worse than inciting homophobic violence.
The campaign to cancel Bounty Killer's concert is supported by the Jamaican gay rights movement, J-Flag, and the Caribbean-wide C-Flag coalition of black gay and straight human rights organisations. They are demanding an end to "murder music" in the Caribbean and worldwide, on the grounds that the release and performance of such songs invariably results in a corresponding rise in queer-bashing violence.
We have no problem with reggae or dancehall music – only with singers who abuse the genre to incite violence against lesbian and gay people. There are many great reggae and dancehall stars who do not stoop to murder music. We salute them.
There is no need for singers to spout violent anti-gay hatred. They choose to do so. It is wilful and malicious incitement of homophobic violence and therefore they must expect to suffer a backlash.
The Stop Murder Music campaign against Bounty Killer and other "kill gays" singers is in solidarity with black lesbian and gay people in Jamaica and the Caribbean who suffer nightmarish levels of homophobic violence. We are acting at their request and in support of their right to live their lives free from threats and violence.
Free speech does not include the right to incite the murder of other human beings. Such violent incitements close down free speech because the victims are intimidated into silence and invisibility.
We see this intimidation in Jamaica, where lesbian and gay people cannot participate in public debates. To do so would open themselves to homophobic murder, as was the tragic fate of the Jamaican gay and HIV campaigners Brian Williamson and Steve Harvey, who were respectively stabbed and shot to death. Free speech yes, but not when it involves incitements to violence and murder.

City set to outlaw 'murder music'

Music inciting hatred towards minorities will be outlawed at pubs and clubs in Brighton under council plans

Under the policy, the playing of all so-called "murder music" could lead to a venue losing its licence.
It would cover all music, live or recorded, allegedly inciting hatred on religious, racial or sexuality grounds.
Last year, the Concorde 2 venue in the city's gay district cancelled a show by dancehall reggae artist Buju Banton who recorded a song with homophobic lyrics.
The Jamaican singer's song, Boom Bye Bye, had lyrics referring to the shooting of gay men, and the concert was cancelled after pressure from the council, police, and the city's gay community.
He has since signed up to a commitment to ban hatred and prejudice from his music.
'Protecting people'
Councillor Dee Simson, chairwoman of the council's licensing committee, said the policy was not to be used "to harm freedom of speech".
She said: "It will be used in really extreme cases to stop the playing of what's loosely termed murder music."
And she said it was only through the venue's "goodwill" that the Buju Banton concert was cancelled last year, because the city had no "explicit policy in place to stop him from playing".
Ms Simson added: "We have a large gay and lesbian community in Brighton and Hove and we want to protect people from facing such hatred.
"I'm a firm believer in freedom of speech but I'm against the incitement of hatred against minorities."
It is not a case of licensing officers going out and checking lyrics
Councillor Dee Simson
She said anyone could raise concerns about a venue's music with the council, in the same way that concerns about anti-social behaviour or violence would be tackled.
The licensing panel would then review the licence, which could be suspended or revoked.
She added: "It must be stressed this small section of the policy is more about giving guidance to licensees and is likely to be used rarely, if at all.
"It is not a case of licensing officers going out and checking lyrics."
And she said it was "not a specific ban" and needed to be "kept in perspective" because there were very few performers whose work fell into the categories.
Free speech
HAVE YOUR SAY
However offensive I find his views I am not required to go and listen to them any more than he is to mine. More control of what people think/say/do is not the answer.
Dan Purkis, London
Send us your comments
Gay rights campaigner Peter Tatchell, from the group OutRage!, said the authority was "to be congratulated for its decision".
"Free speech does not include the right to advocate the killing of other human beings," he said.

OUTWEEKLY INVESTIGATE MURDER MUSIC IN DANCEHALL THIS WEEK 17-21 NOVEMBER,2008

Met police defend decision not to ban homophobic performer

London's police service has been criticised by gay rights activists for allowing a concert by a notoriously homophobic singer to go ahead in the city this weekend.
It is the second time the Met have been accused of double standards for allowing a concert by Bounty Killer.
At his Easter Sunday concert in Stratford he did not perform any of his songs that call for gay people to be killed.
The Jamaican reggae and dancehall DJ, born Rodney Price, had two concerts cancelled in Bradford and Birmingham in March following protests by the gay human rights group OutRage!
The Met have previously stated that artists would not be allowed to perform unless they sign the Reggae Compassionate Act (RCA), which prohibits the performance of any music that encourages or glorifies any form of violence.
Price, who was brought up in Kingston, Jamaica, became a household name in Jamaica in the early 90s, and later became known in the USA and Europe after collaborating with the Fugees, Wyclef Jean and No Doubt.
In 2003, he cancelled two of his concerts in the UK, fearing he would be arrested for the homophobic content of his songs.
Price's lyrics include the lines "You know we need no promo to rub out dem homo" and "Mi ready fi go wipe out this fag", which encourage the murder of homosexuals.
The Met police told PinkNews.co.uk:
"We are aware of a planned concert by the artist Bounty Killer at Stratford Rex on Sunday November 23rd.
"Conferences have been held between the police, the venue's management and the artist's manager in order to consider the most productive way to handle the matter.
"A previous concert at the venue with the artist passed of without incident. The club have given us full access and we will deal robustly with any offences that arise."
It is understood that Bounty Killer has given an undertaking not to perform any of his homophobic songs.
"The Metropolitan Police is hypocritical on hate crimes," said Peter Tatchell, co-ordinator of the Stop Murder Music campaign.
"It allows homophobic singers to perform in London, but not racist ones.
"Racist artists are banned on the grounds that they are a threat to public order and good community relations. This is a case of double standards.
"The Met Police have previously said that murder music singers will not be allowed to perform unless they sign the RCA.
"Officers have broken their promise. They are taking the side of a singer who has promoted and celebrated the murder of gay people, and who is defying the RCA.
"The police do, however, stress that Bounty Killer will not be permitted to perform songs that incite homophobic violence. Big deal.
"A white racist singer who advocated killing black people would not be allowed to perform in London, even if he agreed to not incite the killing of black people at his concert. They have adopted this zero tolerance policy towards white racist bands like Skrewdriver.
"Yet when it comes to straight homophobic singers who urge the murder of gay people, the police take a softer stance. They have agreed to let the concert go ahead, despite their professed commitment to oppose homophobic hate crimes. It's bare-faced hypocrisy."
Mr Tatchell, who is a parliamentary candidate for the Green party, also accused gay people of apathy.
"Much of our queer community is riddled with internalised homophobia, including gay rights organisations - many of which apparently agree with the police that inciting racist violence is worse than inciting homophobic violence," he said.
A spokesman for the concert's organisers Cavalli and Paradise Promotions told the Daily Mail:
"He performed two months ago at the Stratford Rex and we were assured by his agency that he had signed the RCA.
"We wouldn't have booked him otherwise because we know the consequences of this. We've worked with the police, who will be securing the event for us, and they seem satisfied."
In July 2007 artists Beenie Man, Sizzla and Capleton, who had previously released anti-gay hate songs, including incitements to murder lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender people, signed up to the Reggae Compassion Act, in a deal brokered with top reggae promoters and Stop Murder Music activists.
The Act reads:
"It must be clear there's no space in the music community for hatred and prejudice, including no place for racism, violence, sexism or homophobia.
"We do not encourage nor minister to HATE but rather uphold a philosophy of LOVE, RESPECT and UNDERSTANDING towards all human beings as the cornerstone of reggae.
"We agree to not make statements or perform songs that incite hatred or violence against anyone from any community."

capleton concert cancelled after Swiss gay groups protest

Reggae star Capleton, who has gone back on a promise not to perform songs encouraging violence against lesbian and gay people has had his concert in Switzerland cancelled.
The performance by Capleton in Basel was due to take place on November 6th but was pulled by the organisers, according to local LGBT rights group Homosexuelle Arbeitsgruppen Basel (HABS).
HABS, together with Stop Murder Music Bern, opposed the concert because Capleton has performed songs encouraging violence against lesbian and gay people, in violation of his commitment to abide by the terms of the Reggae Compassionate Act (RCA).
He signed the agreement in early 2007 and undertook to not perform "murder music" songs any more.
Stop Murder Music Bern was able to prove that after he signed the RCA Capleton has performed songs that incite homophobic violence, including during last year's Christmas Extravaganza concert in Jamaica.
"The Stop Murder Music campaign gave Capleton a chance to continue his career unimpeded if he agreed to stop inciting the murder of lesbian and gay people," said Peter Tatchell, gay rights activist and UK coordinator of the Stop Murder Music campaign.
"He signed the RCA and promised to abide by it. But he has carried on as before, stirring up homophobic hatred and violence. We feel tricked, betrayed and cheated.
"Congratulations to the Swiss campaigners for getting his concert pulled. Performers who promote the killing of other human beings should not be rewarded with concerts, money and stardom.
"This is the latest of scores of concert cancellations secured by our SMM activists around the world.
"We have targeted eight Jamaican dancehall singers whose lyrics glorify, encourage and promote the murder of lesbian and gay people.
"Their incitements are a criminal offence. Our aim is to show these artists that homophobia doesn't pay. It has a damaging financial consequence," added Mr Tatchell.
In July 2007 artists Beenie Man, Sizzla and Capleton, who had previously released anti-gay hate songs, including incitements to murder lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender people, signed up to the Reggae Compassion Act, in a deal brokered with top reggae promoters and Stop Murder Music activists.
The Act reads:
"It must be clear there's no space in the music community for hatred and prejudice, including no place for racism, violence, sexism or homophobia.
"We do not encourage nor minister to HATE but rather uphold a philosophy of LOVE, RESPECT and UNDERSTANDING towards all human beings as the cornerstone of reggae.
"We agree to not make statements or perform songs that incite hatred or violence against anyone from any community."
However, in October 2007 planned Sizzla concerts in Toronto were banned. All five dates of the star's 2004 UK tour were cancelled after gay rights activists protested against his presence.
Earlier this year it was revealed that Sizzla was denied a Schengen visa for a proposed European tour.
The German Foreign Office phoned the Lesbian and Gay Federation in Germany to confirm the ban and to confirm that their embassy in Kingston, Jamaica, confirmed that the singer has songs in his repertoire that meet the legal criterion of "incitement of the people."
The Schengen Agreement between 29 nations on the continent of Europe allows free movement across their borders.
A common Schengen visa allows tourists access to all the countries party to the agreement.

Human Sexuality

The United Nations Population Fund (UNFPA) released its annual State of the World Population report. This version focused on the need for all societies to invest in adolescents' health and rights. The report informs us that there are over 1.2 billion adolescents who are on the verge of entering adulthood.Theses young persons are largely in schools and they are at a very important stage in their own development and in the shaping of the world of the future. To this end, the UNFPA report stresses the need "to increase knowledge, opportunities and choices" so that young people can make the decisions that will guarantee them healthy and productive lives, "so that they can contribute fully to their communities and to a more stable and prosperous world."In order to get to this point, the UNFPA report encourages all Governments to give young people accurate and honest information on reproductive health and on human sexuality. Indeed, it should be self-evident that adolescents need a multidisciplinary approach to the complex dynamics of human sexuality and the variety of relationships that emerge from this complex. Schools must therefore be seen as very important institutions in the formulation and dissemination of the knowledge that is needed to encourage the deepest understanding of human sexuality.At this juncture, there is no point arguing that sex education should be left entirely to the family ­ whatever its form. In discussing where adolescents get their information, The State of the World Population 2003 asserts that "in most cases parents are not the primary source of information although young women may rely on their mothers for information about menstruation and pregnancy risks."Within this broad framework of changing family dynamics and the diminishing role of many traditional institutions, the time has come for a serious discussion on the role of schools in the education of young people about human sexuality. In the October 12, 2003 edition of The Sunday Gleaner, assistant news editor Garwin Davis reported that the Reverend Canon Ernle Gordon has called for a broadening of sex education in Jamaican schools. This broadening, he proposes, should include discussions on all aspects of human sexuality, including homosexuality. The proposal that homosexuality should be discussed in the sex education curriculum of all schools and at the appropriate age level would be seen as merely "good common sense" in many societies, but not so in Jamaica. Canon Gordon's suggestions and his plea for tolerance are being challenged by many and varied voices.The time has come for all Jamaicans to start an honest dialogue about all the social and political issues that continue to wreak havoc at the level of the individual and on the wider community. Instead of being distracted by the antics of those who are determined to "bury their heads in the sand" in order to pretend that the variations in human sexual orientation is of no consequence to our young people, we need to listen to questions that adolescents and the youth are asking. We also need to take time out to attend more closely to the related issues that have been raised by the Rev. Canon Gordon, Mr. Howard Hamilton and Dr. Peter Figueroa. These persons, amongst others, have clearly shown the link between the social and psychological barriers of discrimination, stigma and ignorance.They have also articulated their concerns about the rapid spread of sexually transmitted diseases, the prevalence of teenage pregnancies and the isolation of many individuals who have no way of validating their sexuality in a harshly heterosexist and intolerant society.THE ROLE OF SCHOOLSThe role of schools must, of necessity, be revisited from time to time. These institutions are expected to make a difference in the lives of all the young people who pass through their doors, therefore schools must be active agents in the transmission of honest information on all aspects of the human condition. Therefore, in schools, no sexually related topic should be too controversial to discuss. Public health knowledge and sex education must be based on scientific research and findings, not on the political and moral agenda of church and state players.In this framework, schools should be expected to develop a meaningful and intelligent curriculum on human sexuality. In such an educational programme a wide range of topics would be accommodated. This kind of programme would force sex educators to rethink the traditionally narrow band of information that passed for "sex education" or "family life" education.No longer should sex education focus on the biological aspects of the reproductive process and the established notions of "boy meets girl" scenario. Teachers would have to stop tiptoeing around issues of celibacy, abstinence, contraception, condom use, and other vital information. They would have to be honest and forthright and stop denying youngsters their basic right to the kind of information that will assist them in avoiding life-threatening sexual scenarios. Young people need to have a good understanding of the complexity of human sexuality, in order for them to understand fully their personal sexual identity and any related confusion.

HOMOSEXUALITY IN SCHOOLS

The suggestion to include an honest discussion on homosexuality in sex education in our schools must not be seen as an effort to "teach people how to become homosexual". It is an effort to get us to a place where we can be tolerant of the variations in the human family. Indeed, it is an effort to remind us that variations of colour, gender and ethnicity have been used to isolate individuals and groups for a very long time. In this process we have become very intolerant of differences, and historically and contemporarily we have oppressed and repressed generations of humanity.Canon Ernle Gordon is merely trying to get us to use the influence of the school to reverse the long debilitating process of the exclusion which has resulted in so much pain globally. Let us not forget that intolerance is deeply imbedded in a very long history of dominator and dominated, oppressor and oppressed, coloniser and colonised, and other forms of universal unequal relationships.Montrealer, Lise Noel, in a seminal work entitled, 'Intolerance: A General Survey demonstrates the insidious and pervasive impact of intolerance by locating the position of oppressive forces in the following description:The oppressor has no apparent existence ... rarely seen, rarely named, he is unique nonetheless in having a full existence; as the keeper of the word, he is the supreme programmer who confers various degrees of existence on those who are different from himself.In other words, the oppressor is powerful enough to marginalise and oppress people on the basis of race, colour, gender, class and sexual orientation.Noel reviewed the role of all major institutions, including the church, in the repression of the human spirit. She concluded that "the mind can sometimes grasp the tragedy of an individual, and sometimes statistically comprehend that of a community, but the drama of each and every individual hidden behind these statistics surpasses understanding."So because we can never fully put ourselves in the place of the "other", the struggle against all forms of intolerance must continue.Without knowledge and critical skills we will continue to discriminate against all those who deviate from the 'norm' of the 'dominant'.Our children are entitled to knowledge based on what is really happening in their society. They need the "full deck" of information on human sexuality, the dangers of risky sexual behaviours, and enough knowledge to comprehend the reality that the human family has always been characterised by both heterosexual and homosexual orientations. With knowledge and critical skills, our young people will be able to articulate and deal with some of the most controversial issues that confront them daily.Dr. Glenda P. Simms is the Executive Director of the Bureau of Women's Affairs

UK Minister challenged jamaica homophobia

A British minister raised the issue of decriminalisation of homosexual acts at a recent meeting with the Prime Minister of Jamaica.
Gareth Thomas, minister of state at the Department for International Development, told PinkNews.co.uk that tackling state and cultural homophobia is vital to the fight against HIV in the Caribbean.
He said he was concerned that "things are not getting better on either front, and more change is necessary."
His role at DFID has responsibility for HIV and Mr Thomas has visited the Caribbean several times.
"During those visits I have been struck by the extent to which homophobia and the anti-gay legislation is impacting the effort to fight the surge of HIV infections," he said.
During a recent meeting with Jamaica's Prime Minister, Foreign Minister and Trade Minister, Mr Thomas raised the issue head on.
"We had an acknowledgment there was an issue, though there was not a conversation about immediate next steps," he said.

Mr Thomas also met with members of Jamaica's gay community and said he was shocked by their experiences.

"Some of their stories are horrific," he told PinkNews.co.uk.
"People who have been forced out of churches, out of their jobs and on occasion, violence.
"By any stretch of the imagination it is a disgrace and we need the state to take action."
The minister, who has been an MP since 1997, said the UK asylum system would look at gay and lesbian asylum seekers on a case by case basis.

A survey published in Jamaica in June found that the Prime Minister's stridently anti-gay statements have boosted his popularity.

45 percent of people in a poll commissioned by the Jamaica Gleaner said that they are more likely to vote for incumbent Prime Minister Bruce Golding and his Jamaica Labour Party after he told the BBC that he would never allow gays in his Cabinet.

26 percent of people who identified as supporters of the rival People's National Party said they were more likely to vote for Golding after his outburst.

Just 5 percent said they were less likely to vote for him after his widely-reported comments.
70% of Jamaicans do not believe that gay men and lesbians should be granted equal rights, the island-wide poll found.

The dancehall music scene on the island is notorious for its homophobia, with many artists taking pleasure in calling for gays and lesbians to be murdered.

That widespread hatred is evident in the wider culture, with reports of gay men and lesbians being attacked by gangs and murdered.

In February this year an attack on a group of men alleged to be homosexual left one man seriously injured and another missing feared dead.

International human rights organisations have described Jamaica as one of the most homophobic places in the world.

Mr Thomas said the only way to make any progress was to engage with government and wider community and make the case for a more tolerant attitude on both human rights and HIV prevention grounds.

straight talk on gay issues

When are we going to deal 'up-front' with the contentious issues emerging around intolerance and sexuality in Jamaica? How can we facilitate intelligent, informed discussions around this matter of homophobia? Can we challenge the generalised assumption of 'rampant homophobia' in our culture? Aren't many of the public expressions of gay condemnation mere demonstrations of straight hypocrisy?

How homophobic are some 'fire burners' when there's no posse and crew around to impress? Are we really 'the most homophobic place on earth?' And Mr Gay Activist, where's the empirical evidence that can concretely link violence against homosexuals to dancehall lyrics? Jamaican homosexuals who die violently are mostly killed by people with whom they develop problematic relationships, and not by homophobic strangers. Isn't that a fact? So, why are some elements in the foreign press busily constructing an image of Jamaicans as homogeneously ignorant, barbaric and violently homophobic?

Mainstream media support

I raise these 'whole heap a' questions because when I look at representations in the overseas press, I see where some gay activists with the support of mainstream media, are attempting a 'shock and awe' approach to confronting the idea of Jamaican homophobia. They're trying to shock people into believing that we have gangs of wicked Jamaicans on every street corner, armed, angry and looking for gay people to murder. Then they're threatening to overwhelm our little country with the awesome might of economic sanctions. If their aim is simply to punish Jamaica - or get refugee status in foreign - they may succeed. But if the intention is to effect change - they're wasting time.

We need to examine the impact of overseas initiatives around these issues. Some of the approaches activate memories of white imperial control. And our people are famously rebellious, especially against attempts to impose 'foreign' strategies to fix Jamaican problems. Look nuh, there are complex issues underpinning Jamaican homophobia that ultimatums, sanctions and international condemnations will not address. Banning dancehall artists or boycotting Jamaican tourism won't help people to examine their intolerance and change their prejudices. It will merely prevent more poor people from 'eating a food', alienate allies, and breed bigger bangarang.

Types of gays

I think there are basically three sets of gay people in Jamaica. First, there are the ones that lead deadly double lives: heterosexual pretence on the public side while their true sexuality they thoroughly hide. Another group lives in quiet truce with this 'conveniently homophobic' society. The closet door either 'pop off' or is transparent, and their homosexuality is 'open secret'. But everybody ignores or tolerates their sexuality because they are respected and valued as professionals; plus they keep their love life private. The third set is 'out' and militant.
They're supported by a loud and growing voice of activism. They're intent on asserting their rights and they refuse to quietly abide in secrecy. I admire their courage. But tell me though, do these activists feel that the quiet set are complicit to the homophobia by having this 'truce' and living in the shadows? Does the quiet set feel that the activists are attracting unnecessary attention and compromising their fragile safety? What is going to happen if the truce gets broken?

Yow, violence is reprehensible. And no matter how righteously opposed we may be to their lifestyle, violence against people because of their sexuality is a dangerous kind of backwardness. So there's a problem. But some people are responding to it with strategies that are reactionary and counter-productive. Shouldn't anti-homophobia activists be trying more culturally sensitive methods of facilitating education and critical thinking among Jamaicans at all levels around sexuality and human rights
?
box-mi-back@hotmail.com